Perspectives

World

Global class struggle

Pandemic

Arts & Culture

History

Capitalism & Inequality

Anti-Imperialism

Videos

Podcast

Marxist Library

Socialist Equality Party

topnav

icfi

International Committee of the Fourth International

history

History of the Fourth International

wsws

About the WSWS

iysse

International Youth and Students for Social Equality

sepnav

2020 US elections

Coronavirus pandemic

SEP (US) presidential campaign

Free Julian Assange!

oldhotnav

home

Home

search

Search

clock

Updates

user

Profile

metanav

Politics

Perspective

Workers Struggles

Economy

Science

Philosophy

News & Analysis

Socialist strategy

The politics of the pseudo-left

Inequality and the social crisis

War and geopolitical conflict

The Fight Against Fascism

Immigrants and refugees

World News

The Matamoros workers rebellion

Los Angeles teachers strike

The “Yellow Vest” protests in France

The fight against the GM plant closures

The Struggle at UPS

Autoworkers struggles

Education in the US

Amazon

Film Reviews

Film Festivals

Interviews with Directors and Artists

Book Reviews

Art &amp; Photographic Exhibitions

Music Reviews

Theater and Dance

Art &amp; Socialism – Lectures &amp; Essays

The 1917 Russian Revolution

Leon Trotsky

Fascism &amp; the Holocaust

US History

The American Revolution

1998 Lectures: Marxism and the Fundamental Problems of the 20th Century

2005 Lectures: Marxism and the Foundation of the Fourth International

This Week in History

World Economy

European Economy

US Economy

Marxist political economy

Questions and replies on Marxist economics

Human Genetics &amp; Evolution

The Internet

Space Research &amp; Astronomy

Climate Change

The Enlightenment

Existentialism and Post-modernism

Religion

more...

mainnav

Fourth International

IYSSE

Contact

Donate

hotnav

Global Class Struggle

Browse articles by country

News & Commentary

WSWS Chronology

Browse online

Mehring Books

Monthly archive

Newsletter

RSS Feeds

fullnav

Why Study the Russian Revolution Vol I & Vol II

default

The Truth Behind the Bankruptcy of Detroit

arts

The Historical &amp; International Foundations of the Partei fur Soziale Gleichheit

correspo

Castroism and the Politics of Petty-Bourgeois Nationalism

In Defense of Leon Trotsky (second edition)

editorials

The Frankfurt School, Postmodernism and the Politics of the Pseudo-Left: A Marxist Critique

The Heritage We Defend: A Contribution to the History of the Fourth International

ic-archive

The Tragedy of the Chinese Revolution

news

A Quarter Century of War: The US Drive for Global Hegemony 1990 - 2016

perspectives

Fundamental Problems of Marxism

philos

The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State

science

Thirty Years Since the PATCO Strike

workers

The Historical & International Foundations of the SEP, Sri Lanka

world

slsep

The Gelfand Case

h-icfi

mehring

Why Are They Back? Historical Falsification, Political Conspiracy, and the Return of Fascism in Germany

eu-right

39903a96-144b-4db7-a3ee-28bbe85fddec

efbc15ec-2e17-45fb-967e-6c7e2a6cb3ff

<placeholder type="page-article-inline-mautic-form" design="" description="false" heading="true"><placeholder type="text-line">Sign up for the WSWS email newsletter</placeholder><placeholder type="text-block"><p>Some content</p></placeholder><placeholder type="mautic-form" form-id="133" html-id=""></placeholder></placeholder>

wsws newsletter

Indonesian students rally against austerity measures implemented by President Prabowo Subianto, in Jakarta, Indonesia, Friday, Feb. 21, 2025.

The Indonesian government of President Prabowo Subianto has begun to implement major budget cuts targeting education, health, infrastructure and the public service. These severe austerity measures have sparked an ongoing student protest movement across the archipelago.

Announced in January, the cost-cutting drive initially totalled $19 billion in cuts, ostensibly to “free up funds” to pay for Prabowo’s free meal program. The program, set to cost $28 billion annually, is aimed at providing free daily meals to 83 million schoolchildren and pregnant mothers. This populist measure was one of the central pillars of Prabowo’s election campaign and a factor in his victory last October, winning 59 percent of the national vote, amid rising poverty and malnutrition.

In order to pay for this election promise, Prabowo has taken an axe to vital public services under the fraudulent pretext of combatting “inefficiency,” seeking to emulate the policies of the Trump administration in the US.

The budgets of several government ministries were slashed. The government claimed the cuts only affect federal workers’ travel, office supplies and electricity use. The cuts, however, are significant: a 70 percent reduction for public works, 52 percent for economic affairs and 40 percent for investment. The measures have also included the scrapping of numerous infrastructure projects and impacted on building maintenance. 

“I continuously demand savings, efficiency,” Prabowo said. “I demand the courage to cut down non-essential items.”

In February, Prabowo escalated this drive when the targeted cuts were raised to $44 billion, or over 15 percent of the state budget. 

Undercutting Prabowo’s professed concern for schoolchildren, funding for primary and secondary education was reduced by $480 million, while the higher education ministry’s budget was slashed by 25 percent, down to $2.6 billion.

The attacks on education sparked outrage on social media among students and young people, concerned that the cuts would mean rising university fees, the cancellation of scholarships and worsening teacher welfare. This led to large student demonstrations in every major city across the nation.

The protest movement has been dubbed “Dark Indonesia,” referring to the country’s social crisis and lack of prospects for youth. The name is a reference to “Golden Indonesia,” one of Prabowo’s election campaign slogans last year. 

The protests, organised by the All-Indonesian Students’ Union, were led by university student councils and convened outside city government offices, where a list of demands was presented. Rallies were held in capital city Jakarta, Surabaya, Medan, Banda Aceh, Makassar and Samarinda, among dozens of other cities. 

The largest demonstration, outside the Jakarta presidential palace on February 20, drew thousands of students. Protesters brandished signs reading “RIP education,” “education emergency in Indonesia” and “the government consists of dumb people.” Protests continue to be organised, but numbers are smaller than at those in late February.

In West Papua, high school students called for free education and an upgrade to school facilities instead of free meals. They also condemned the program’s use of soldiers in distributing the free meals and growing militarisation within their schools.

Some protests escalated into near clashes with the police. In Jakarta, police used tear gas and water cannon to disperse the crowds, according to the 

. In Surabaya, authorities reportedly used water cannon and arrested five students.

While opposing the austerity measures, students also raised broader economic and social issues: the rising cost of living, skyrocketing food and fuel prices, lack of subsidised cooking gas and growing social inequality. In that sense, the protests, although populated by students, reflected far wider anger over declining living standards.

The students’ list of demands included a reassessment of the budget cuts and the free meal program, as well as “free, scientific and democratic education” and an end to state corruption and the military’s dominant role in the government. The protests called for the implementation of “pro-people policies” to protect education, health and social welfare.

Cleorisa, 20, a protester studying at Jakarta’s National University, told the 

 the free meals program is “not effective because it sacrifices education… What the public needs is education and healthcare… we need proper education to get proper jobs.”

Protest leader Herianto told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: “The free meals aren’t, as promised, being delivered in all areas of the country, so millions of children aren’t even receiving them… Our demands reflect how dark the social-economic situation in Indonesia is, and how hard life in Indonesia is for young people.”

The dire conditions for Indonesian youth have prompted the social media hashtag #KaburAjaDulu (“Just Leave First”), which has been circulated widely during the protests and promotes the idea of leaving the country to seek job opportunities abroad.

Unemployment in Indonesia is dominated by Generation Z, or those aged 15-24, which makes up 16 percent of the country’s increasingly young population. According to the latest official data, the unemployment rate in this age cohort was 17.3 percent last August, far higher than the national rate of 4.9 percent, and particularly high among university graduates and those with vocational college diplomas. 

While it is understandable that some students may want to flee Indonesia to escape these problems, it is certainly not a solution for many students who do not have the financial means to do so. Nor is it a solution for the Indonesian working class and rural poor, who live under increasingly impoverished conditions and are bearing the brunt of the government’s pro-business austerity policies.

In response to the protests and #KaburAjaDulu, several government ministers denounced students. Deputy manpower minister Immanuel Ebenezer said, “If they want to run away, just run. Do not return, if necessary.”

Prabowo remained silent for a week after the protests began. Then, on February 25, he publicly slammed the protesters and the idea of a “dark” future, citing predictions by investment firm Goldman Sachs from three years ago that Indonesia would be the world’s fourth-largest economy by 2050.

Since coming into office, Prabowo has claimed he will boost Indonesia’s annual growth to 8 percent, up from around 5 percent currently. However, Bank Indonesia cut its 2025 growth forecast in January down to a potential 4.7 percent, pointing to a weaker economic outlook and sluggish domestic consumption.

The government recently revealed that nearly half of the funds from budget cuts, $20 billion, will be diverted to a newly launched sovereign wealth fund, called Danantara. Prabowo has said this will help reach the 8 percent growth target, and will be used to invest in lucrative projects such as food estates, renewables and the nickel industry. In other words, he has effectively taken personal control of a significant portion of the country’s assets.

Prabowo’s austerity cuts are being undertaken amid heightened global economic instability, fuelled by the Trump administration’s trade war measures, aimed in particular at China. The Indonesian ruling class, as with its global counterparts, is seeking to escalate austerity and attack the living standards of the working class.

This is the agenda Prabowo has been tasked with enacting, on behalf of the financial elite he represents. He has been promoted by the Indonesian political establishment as the right person to suppress social tensions amid rising economic turmoil. 

It should be remembered that Prabowo himself, a former general in the Suharto military dictatorship, was responsible for torturing and “disappearing” 22 student protest leaders in the 1998 mass protests against the Suharto regime, which collapsed amid the Asian economic crisis. That is just one element of his blood-soaked record as an operative for the military junta, personally responsible for countless atrocities. Today, he will not hesitate to use state repression as opposition towards his policies mounts.

That such a monstrous figure has returned to power is a total refutation of the notion of 

—that Indonesia would undergo a democratic transformation after the fall of Suharto. All the “democratic” political parties of the Indonesian ruling elite, including the PDIP, helped to rehabilitate and whitewash Prabowo as a legitimate politician. 

Students and young people who want to fight Prabowo’s dictatorial policies cannot put any faith in making futile appeals to the various capitalist parties, nor will leaving the country solve anything. 

Instead, they should turn towards the task of mobilising the broad mass of the working class and rural masses of Indonesia in an independent movement, against the government and its austerity drive. Such a movement needs to be based on a socialist perspective, aimed at taking political power and expropriating the vast wealth of the corporate elite to meet the needs of society.

Prabowo has taken an axe to vital public services, slashing up to $44 billion from education, health and infrastructure.

Indonesian government’s austerity measures provoke student protests

as-indon

Indonesia

asia

Asia and the Pacific

ineq-us

Capitalism and inequality

The archive lists all articles that have been posted on the <em>World Socialist Web Site</em> by date.

My reading list

All our articles you've <strong>visited</strong> in this browser will automatically appear here.

Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information).